Thu 5 Mar 2009
Over the course of the last month, I’ve paid $30 in overdraft fees to Citibank. I would’ve bounced 3 checks if not for the overdraft protection. I’m madder than a rabid raccoon about it. No, I’m not in any kind of financial trouble. I actually have a healthy emergency stash in my Citibank account.
The problem is in November, Citibank changed its overdraft policy. Apparently I was notified by an insert in my account statement. I read my statements online, and rarely look at the printable version. I was caught unaware. In the past they would draw from my overdraft credit line of $2400 to cover any account debit that exceeded my balance. This was perfect for me as I generally keep very little in my checking account. It’s a non interest bearing checking account. I have been much better off keeping the majority of my money in the attached saving account or money market account. As I check my account directly or indirectly through an agregator such as Yodlee on daily basis, I tend to notice my over-extensions, usually day of. I would then be able to quickly transfer money from my savings account, and everything would be good. Over the course of the last three years, I paid less than a $1 in total interest associated with me drawing down my line of credit.
My system has come to a screeching stop. Citibank now charges me $10 each time I dip into my overdraft line of credit. Citibank had been unusual, and now it’s following what has become standard overdraft “protection” policy. Bank of America has charged $25 for each (which has been raised to $35) for as long as I remember. One of the reasons I bank(ed) with Citibank was the overdraft policy. It was a feature that made sense instead a “feature” intended to extract more dollars from the customers.
Most banks offer overdraft protection, and most offer it by linking your checking account with your savings account. When a debit exceeds the balance in the checking account, the bank automatically funds that debit via funds from the savings account. For this privilege, the bank charges you, the customer, a $25 fee in the case of Bank of America.
Citibank had been above the fray, and for this I have a been a loyal customer. This new change makes me question if my loyalty is still deserved. The problem is Citibank’s new rule is standard practice rather than the exception.
If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed
March 5th, 2009 at 10:02 am
Wow, that is shocking to read. Then what is the point of having an overdraft?
Like you, I have the same setup. Very minimal in checking and rest in an online savings account. I find the overdraft protection useful for case where I am low but when I notice the discrepancy, I transfer money over to address it and pay the few cents I incur. With this change, makes it useless with the fees attached. I have a couple of checking accounts with this feature (citizens and Schwab) and no notice about it if this is standard procedure for those accounts but will now have to be on the look out for it now.
March 5th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Wayne, I definitely check with Citizen’s on what their policy is as right now. I’ve come across an article or two that would indicate that they may have enacted a similar policy.
http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1154232
March 19th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
I’m glad I read this - I had the same experience. The customer service person I spoke to at Citi waived the $20 (2 fees) THIS time, but said that is their NEW policy. I got somewhat irate and questioned what is the point of even having overdraft protection if there’s a prohibitive charge; she couldn’t answer. [of course I then apologized for getting mad at HER . . . but it really is crazy]
I’ve banked with Citi for decades, and I’m surprised to hear that’s common practice at most other banks. I will ponder switching to another bank (that doesn’t do this) as a matter of principle — if I can find one.