Thu 26 Jul 2007
There is always some debate about what should be include in one’s net worth. These are the accounts I include.
Assets:
- 401K Account
- IRA Accounts
- Brokerage Accounts
- Checking Accounts
- Savings Accounts
- Real Estate
Liabilities
- Mortgage
- Students Loans
- Credit Card Balances
- Deferred Tax Payments
What I purposely don’t include are personal possessions including my car. I don’t have an expensive art collection or such so my personal belongings are probably worth less than 5,000 including the car when all totaled up. There are two reasons why I choose to not to include personal possessions. In general the value of personal possessions are scattered across a wide range of items, making it difficult to easily liquidate everything. So if I were to even mark everything at fair value, it’d be highly unlikely I’d be able to get fair value for the items in short amount of time. The other and more important reason I don’t include personal possessions is purely because they are personal items I don’t own furniture as a financial asset. I don’t buy jewelry (actually I don’t buy jewelry at all) thinking that I might resell at later date. I could make the same argument for my home (if I actually lived in it), but given the sizable value tied up in a home, it’d imprudent not to include it at all especially since the mortgage is included as a liability. However, I do believe it’s important to mark the value of real estate conservatively. I’ve marked my condo at cost even though it’s increased some in the 4 years sinceĀ I’ve brought it. I think it’s best to update real estate values up only when there’s more than 10% increase or decrease. Anything less than that is really speculation on what the property will sell at.
Personally much of my net worth is tied up in my retirement accounts, 401k specifically. While I account for the deferred tax liability, I don’t account for any prepayment penalties that I might incur if I needed to access that money. In the future I might further discount the value of my 401k, and IRA accounts by whatever penalty I might incur to access the money. The more I think about, the more I think I should. Back when I wasn’t fully vested in my 401k, I didn’t include the unvested portion if my net worth calculation. In effect I’m not fully vested in my 401k and IRA until I turn 59 1/2. I plan on waiting till that age, but I should value the account at what’s actually available to me at my current age by including the 10% penalty as an additional liability.
If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the RSS feed
July 26th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Hello. You are correct to exclude unvested money (it is not even Accounts Receivable yet)and to count current taxes and penalties to withdraw funds today. Net worth is if you liquidated everything but the shirt on your back today, so you should count car equity and some people use a generic $5k for the sum of coats, blenders, etc.
Now, whether or not net worth is useful is an entirely different question over which I have spilled some ink.
July 27th, 2007 at 9:16 pm
I tend to use net worth as very conservative benchmark of just checking where I stand. I agree it might not be the best measure of that even. Sometimes I think about indexing it better for inflation and relative prosperity as well…